Skip to main content

To: Matthew Pennycook MP, Housing Minister

Mandate councils to adopt unadopted estates and prevent double-charging

Elephant Park – one example of an estate ‘unadopted’ by Southwark Council
The government must act on the issue of financially-burdensome unadopted estates recently raised in a Parliamentary debate brought by Rebecca Paul MP.

We call on Matthew Pennycook MP to mandate councils to adopt unadopted public parks, roads and communal land, removing the unfair and burdensome costs disproportionately borne by a small number of homeowners. 

Why is this important?

Across the country, ordinary people are being forced to pay thousands of pounds a year for public parks, roads and communal spaces on top of their council tax. 

This happens on so-called unadopted estates, where councils approve new developments but never take responsibility for maintaining the public spaces created. Instead, the costs are passed permanently to residents through uncapped service charges.

These parks and roads are:
  • open to everyone
  • promoted by councils as public amenities
  • part of the everyday fabric of towns and cities
Yet the bill is quietly pushed onto a small group of households – families, key workers, pensioners and first-time buyers – many of whom are already struggling with the cost of living.

Although initially well-intentioned, Councils are complicit in arrangements that have pushed costs onto some of the poorest in society, with the risk of pushing their constituents into poverty. 


Case study: Elephant Park, Southwark
Elephant Park is a major regeneration development with a large central park that is open to everyone and promoted as a public space. But local residents are paying for it privately.

For a small one-bed flat in South Gardens, the typical 2025–26 service charge is £6,202. Around 15% of this goes towards public parkland and surrounding roads. 

That means almost £1,000 a year paid by one resident towards public spaces, on top of their council tax.

This is double charging: ordinary people paying twice for parks and roads that are meant to be public.


This is a national problem, not a one-off
Residents across the country are affected  from major regeneration schemes to new housing estates and garden communities.

Examples raised publicly include developments in:
  • Elephant Park (London Borough of Southwark)
  • St Edeyrn’s Village (Cardiff)
  • Vickers Green (Crayford, London Borough of Bexley)
  • Garden City (Kent)
  • Church Meadows (Great Broughton, Cumbria)
  • Carleton Meadows (Penrith, Cumbria)
  • Elm Farm / Wymondham New Estates (Norfolk)
  • Brookdale Estate (Aiskew, North Yorkshire)
  • Queensgate Development (Stockton-on-Tees)
  • Wynyard Park (County Durham / Teesside)
  • Lodge Hill Development (Chattenden, Medway)
  • Hoo Peninsula New Estates (Medway, Kent)
  • West Myreton Estate (Menstrie, Clackmannanshire)
  • Greenbelt Estates – Kirkcaldy (Fife)
  • Greenbelt Estates – Kilmarnock (East Ayrshire)
  • Fairfields Estate (Milton Keynes)
  • Whitehouse Park (Milton Keynes)
  • Kingsbrook (Aylesbury Vale, Buckinghamshire)
  • Cranbrook New Community (East Devon)
  • Great Kneighton (Cambridge)
  • Trumpington Meadows (Cambridge)
  • Northstowe (Cambridgeshire)
  • Barking Riverside (London Borough of Barking & Dagenham)
  • Chobham Manor (Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, London)
  • East Village (Stratford, London)
  • Newhall (Harlow, Essex)
  • Sherford New Community (Devon / Plymouth)
  • Poundbury (Dorchester)
  • Upton (Northampton)
  • Cambourne (Cambridgeshire)
  • Meridian Water (Enfield, London)
  • Kidbrooke Village (Greenwich, London)
In every case, the pattern is the same: public infrastructure paid for by a small number of residents, with no cap to the their charges. 


Parliament has heard the evidence
In a recent House of Commons debate and evidence sessions on property service charges, MPs heard directly from residents paying for unadopted roads, parks and communal land.

During that debate, Rebecca Paul MP made a clear recommendation:

Councils should be mandated to adopt unadopted parks and roads. 

This would end the practice of residents paying twice and close the planning loophole that has allowed “fleecehold” estates to spread.

The evidence is clear.

The solution has been stated publicly in Parliament.

What’s missing is government action. 


What we’re calling for
We call on the UK Government to:

  • Mandate councils to adopt unadopted public parks, roads and communal spaces
  • Reform planning and Section 106 rules so public infrastructure cannot be permanently funded by residents
  • End double charging where people pay council tax and private service charges for the same services
  • Protect residents from uncapped, unaffordable estate charges

Public spaces should be funded publicly, not hidden on household bills.

Ordinary people should not be used as a substitute tax base. 

How it will be delivered

We plan to deliver the petition to Housing Minister, Matthew Pennycook MP, in advance of the March 2026 consultation on unadopted estates.

Category

Updates

2026-01-06 22:21:30 +0000

The problem of unadopted estates was outlined by Rachel Cunliffe in a recent New Statesman article: https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk-politics/2025/07/who-is-accountable-in-privatised-britain

“Fleecehold is now the norm across the country. Whereas councils used to adopt new estates, the Competition and Markets Authority has found that 80 per cent of new homes built by the 11 largest developers in 2021-22 were sold under the fleecehold system. There are stories of owners being assured their estate would be adopted as a formality, only to still be paying fees a decade on.

You might imagine the council would step in. But, as I found out in Hitchin, cash-strapped local authorities have little incentive to ensure developments are built to standard, as adopting them means adopting additional costs. The developers, meanwhile, have little incentive to come back to complete repairs once the houses have been sold.”

2026-01-06 21:44:24 +0000

Unadopted estates were recently raised at Prime Minister’s Questions by Mid Cheshire MP, Andrew Cooper:

“Thousands of families are moving into new estates only to discover basic infrastructure, - roads, drains, and sewers – remain in limbo and unadopted by public authorities.

They face this uncertainty with no guarantee over maintenance, safety, and future costs, often years after developers have walked away.

This is deeply unfair and completely avoidable.”

In his constituency, 12 per cent of households in the area are affected.

Read the full article here:
https://www.northwichguardian.co.uk/news/25687991.unadopted-roads-mid-cheshire-new-estates-raised-pmqs/

2026-01-05 17:57:09 +0000

Wow. We’re at 200 signatures in less than 24 hours. Thank you for supporting the petition.

The Government have recently opened a consultation on the prevalence of unadopted estates. Please consider sharing your views before it closes in March 2026:
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/reducing-the-prevalence-of-private-estate-management-arrangements

We plan to deliver this petition to Matthew Pennycook MP ahead of the consultation deadline.

In the meantime, please continue to share with your neighbours, friends and family who find themselves affected too.

2026-01-05 11:02:14 +0000

100 signatures reached

2026-01-04 20:30:56 +0000

A recent study of over 1,000 new housing developments built over the last three years found that just 10% of sites had the roads adopted.

Read more here: https://www.hbf.co.uk/news/unadopted-estates/

2026-01-04 19:52:11 +0000

The Government have recently opened a consultation on the prevalence of unadopted estates.

Please consider sharing your views before it closes in March 2026:
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/reducing-the-prevalence-of-private-estate-management-arrangements

2026-01-04 19:28:49 +0000

Thank you for the strong response to this petition so far. It’s reassuring to know others also feel the injustice of this issue.

Please continue to share with others who are in a similar position. We hope by sharing across UK estates that fund unadopted public spaces that we’ll put forward a compelling collective voice that will push the government towards action. Thank you again for your energy so far.

2026-01-04 18:51:55 +0000

50 signatures reached

2026-01-04 14:58:07 +0000

25 signatures reached

2026-01-04 12:41:03 +0000

10 signatures reached