Skip to main content

To: David Cameron

Change the way Secretaries of State are appointed.

Based on the unpopularity of Michael Gove, Nicky Morgan and Jeremy Hunt and their decision making being void of empirical knowledge or research; there is need for a change in how Secretaries of State (SOS)are appointed.

Why is this important?

The above MPs are examples of unpopular unqualified Secretaries of State (SOS) and illustrate the obvious need for a move away from the "lucky dip" approach to assigning secretaries of states.

In contrast, teachers and nurses have to study, have to complete Personal and Professional Development (PPD) reflective diaries in order to reflect, learn and improve their critical thinking skills and practice, as well as complete continued professional development (CPD). This would be done with reference to current peer reviewed articles and judged by qualified higher level academics.

The same should be expected of those in positions of Power, like Secretaries of State (SOS).

Here are alternatives to the "lucky dip" approach:

The appointed must...

1. have an appropriate qualification in the field that has had a minimum of 1 year practice placement, or...

2. complete a compulsory six month practice placement, one month pertaining to different levels of practice in the field (that will help the person to obtain a holistic view of their area responsibility). Furthermore, five qualified advisors must be appointed (one for each year of office), who vote on the secretary's decisions. The appointed person in this option will be payed less as they lack the qualifications and the difference will be payed to their advisors, or....

3. be supported by five (one for each year of office) qualified specialists put forward by the elected party, these are then voted in by professionals who work in the field.

Category

Updates

2016-04-06 11:02:55 +0100

10 signatures reached