25 signatures reached
To: Police Crime Commissioners
£1 million for police to change crown logos - we need legislation now!
Republic's latest report showed how Charles' choice of crown resulted in police forces across the country having to change logos at a cost of almost £1 million.
Police Crime Commissioners must push for legislation so that no future monarch can cause such a waste of money - police forces needed that £1 million for frontline duties!
Police Crime Commissioners must push for legislation so that no future monarch can cause such a waste of money - police forces needed that £1 million for frontline duties!
Why is this important?
Charles' choice was wrong for several reasons:
1. Misuse of Public Funds: Taxpayer money is collected to fund essential services such as healthcare, education, infrastructure, and public welfare. Using it for a frivolous or unnecessary purpose undermines trust in how public finances are managed and allocated.
2. Erosion of Public Confidence: The monarchy relies heavily on public goodwill to maintain its position in British society. King Charles is now perceived as being wasteful and out of touch with the financial struggles of ordinary citizens. It is damaging for the monarchy's reputation and legitimacy.
3. Opportunity Cost: £1 million could habe bee put to better use addressing pressing social issues, such as tackling homelessness, improving schools, or funding the NHS. Choosing to waste it deprives society of these potential benefits.
4. Symbol of Inequality: The monarchy is already seen by many as a symbol of privilege and wealth. Such an action reinforces perceptions of inequality, particularly as it occurred during a time of economic hardship for many Britons.
5. Ethical Responsibility: As a national figure, King Charles is expected to act responsibly and lead by example. Squandering taxpayer money on a whim can be seen as a failure to fulfil this moral obligation.
1. Misuse of Public Funds: Taxpayer money is collected to fund essential services such as healthcare, education, infrastructure, and public welfare. Using it for a frivolous or unnecessary purpose undermines trust in how public finances are managed and allocated.
2. Erosion of Public Confidence: The monarchy relies heavily on public goodwill to maintain its position in British society. King Charles is now perceived as being wasteful and out of touch with the financial struggles of ordinary citizens. It is damaging for the monarchy's reputation and legitimacy.
3. Opportunity Cost: £1 million could habe bee put to better use addressing pressing social issues, such as tackling homelessness, improving schools, or funding the NHS. Choosing to waste it deprives society of these potential benefits.
4. Symbol of Inequality: The monarchy is already seen by many as a symbol of privilege and wealth. Such an action reinforces perceptions of inequality, particularly as it occurred during a time of economic hardship for many Britons.
5. Ethical Responsibility: As a national figure, King Charles is expected to act responsibly and lead by example. Squandering taxpayer money on a whim can be seen as a failure to fulfil this moral obligation.
How it will be delivered
We will deliver the petition to Police Crime Commissioners
