To: Leicester,Leicestershire and Rutland Combined Fire Authority

Do not remove the second fire engine from Oakham Fire Station

Revoke the decision to remove the second fire engine from Oakham Fire Station

Why is this important?

If you are not aware, the decision has been made to remove the second fire engine and retained Firefighters from Oakham Fire Station on the 31/03/16. Removing the second fire engine and retained Firefighters from Oakham Fire Station will mean slower response times to emergencies, which will have a significant impact, putting life and property at greater risk in Rutland and surrounding areas. There is also a very high likelihood of the Heavy Rescue Unit (HRU) also crewed by Oakham retained Firefighters and used for incidents involving larger vehicles also being removed.
You may be aware that Uppingham are now recruiting retained Firefighters…..! This is because they are under crewed and struggle to keep their fire engine “on the run” (available for calls). If the second fire engine at Oakham is removed, the fire engine at Uppingham in most cases will be the fire engine to cover Oakham when the first fire engine (Oakham’s first fire engine) is on a call. When Uppingham are not available it could be a fire engine from Melton or Leicester covering.
We all understand that money has to be saved, but removing front line services in not the way. We all pay our council tax with a proportion of it going to Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Combined Fire Authority (check your council tax demand notice for details). We do not mind paying this as we all feel that if we are unlucky enough to be involved in an accident or a fire, with rapid response from the fire service hopefully the outcome will not be too severe. If the removal of the second fire engine goes ahead leaving a greatly reduced service, putting life and property at greater risk in Rutland and surrounding areas, do you think we will then be getting a discount in our council tax to reflect the change…? I doubt this very much, so we would be paying the same for a greatly reduced service.
We cannot let this happen, we need to keep all the people of Rutland and surrounding areas as safe as possible and respond to emergencies as quick as possible. This will be your last chance to make your opinion count; I fear that if the second fire engine is removed there will be no chance of it returning. Please sign the petition.

Oakham LE15

Maps © Stamen; Data © OSM and contributors, ODbL

Categories


Reasons for signing

  • Do people really have to say, they save lives.
  • I signed this because it's not just Oakham they cover they cover everywhere even a back up for what was the RAF camp now Army camp and they also handy for the motorway that's always busy
  • Considering what they cover and the number of road accidents we need this cover.

Updates

2016-01-20 22:31:34 +0000

100 signatures reached

2016-01-20 20:06:58 +0000

50 signatures reached

2016-01-20 17:17:15 +0000

25 signatures reached

2016-01-20 12:38:52 +0000

10 signatures reached