To: U.K. Government

Ridiculous Jam Laws

Ridiculous Jam Laws

We, the undersigned, call on the U.K. government to reduce the minimum permitted sugar level in jams to 51% (from 60%).

Why is this important?

A small British jam manufacturer (husband & wife team) recently introduced the first ever British apple-based jams onto the U.K. high street. However, the U.K. government has stated these products cannot legally be called jam because they don't contain enough sugar!!!

Standard jams have a sugar content exceeding 60%; however, these apple-based jams have a sugar content of 52-53%. Unfortunately, between 51-59% sugar content there is no clear legal definition as to what these British apple-based products should be called. It's a jam 'no-mans land'!

Jam Law across the EU is meant to be harmonised. However, France, Germany and Denmark have all recently used an 'escape clause' in the legislation to permit jams with sugar content below 60%. The U.K. government now needs to use this 'escape clause' to account for British apple-based jams.

After 12 months of battling for the issue to be addressed, the U.K. government has finally agreed to consult on making changes to the Law (see http://www.defra.gov.uk/files/jam-consult-statement.pdf). However, there is no guarantee that the Law will be changed and it wouldn’t occur until the end of 2013. We therefore need to keep pressure on the U.K. government to ensure the ridiculous Jam Laws are changed.

During these recessionary times, it is vital that the U.K. government supports British business, British innovation and British-specific traditions, i.e. Bramley apple growing.

With obesity rates increasing, we should also be encouraging the general public to consume jams with more fruit and less added sugar.


Reasons for signing

  • Lower sugar jams are good for our health. We need the option to call them all jams, especially if they still keep well and taste good

Updates

2014-01-09 20:28:42 +0000

50 signatures reached