"THINKING ANGLICAN" THOUGHTS - AND COMMENTS
http://www.thinkinganglicans.org.uk/archives/007315.html#comments
..."Carol" isn't a child; she's a grown woman who [has] lived longer than many posting here; a woman who's chosen, of her own free will, and acting under legal advice, to sue the church. She knowingly opened her accusation to legal scrutiny.
Since she was granted (wrongly, in my view) anonymity, that should be respected, but the substance of her claim should be released with her name redacted. Yes, there's some small risk her name would get out, but if it'd gone to trial, that would've happened anyway: the gag order applies only to the press, not the court or the public gallery. Currently, it's being used to hide the church's actions from scrutiny.
~ James Byron - Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 12:55am