Skip to main content

To: National Grid

No New Pylons in the Lake District

No New Pylons in the Lake District

We urge National Grid to pursue an offshore route for its new powerlines and abandon plans to site huge pylons in the Lake District National Park. We believe the offshore route is the only one which ensures the protection of the Lake District .

Why is this important?

During the autumn of 2014 National Grid ran a consultation called "North West Coast Connections" asking members of the public how it should get power from the proposed new Moorside power station in west Cumbria into the high voltage transmission grid.

On 17 June 2015 – despite widespread opposition - National Grid announced the decision to take forward its preferred option. This would see huge new pylons and overhead lines in the Lake District National Park and other sensitive protected areas, causing massive damage to the beautiful landscape and wildlife. At 50m tall, the new pylons would be twice the height of existing pylons and more than twice as wide. They would break the skyline from many viewpoints and create a permanent eyesore.

National Grid provided an alternative offshore option for the public to comment on. The offshore route would take the powerline underground and then out to sea, where cables laid in the sea bed would link it into the national grid near Blackpool. National Grid has always accepted that this route is feasible, but it is not the route it wanted to take .

In a previous public consultation in 2012, there was overwhelming support for the offshore route because it had the least impact on the Lake District.
Although the majority of respondents to the 2014 consultation also supported the offshore option, National Grid has disregarded the wishes of the public.

A number of stakeholder organisations that supported the onshore option did so with the proviso that National Grid takes satisfactory measures – such as routing cables underground - to mitigate the effects of pylons in sensitive areas. It now appears likely that adequate mitigation will NOT be offered.

National Parks were created in order to protect beautiful areas for the people of Britain; we do not want to see 27 miles of 50m tall pylons (connected by multiple conductor wires) in and next to the Lake District National Park.

We want your help to persuade National Grid that the offshore option IS the best route because it would both secure our future electricity supplies AND protect the Lake District’s wonderful landscapes.

As well as signing the petition, please also consider joining Power Without Pylons (membership free) and Friends of the Lake District.
You could also write to newspapers, newsletters and magazines; and if you live in an area likely to be affected, contact your MP and raise concerns with your parish council.

As well as this petition, we are currently running a write-in campaign to encourage members of the public to contact National Grid, the MP and Liz Truss the Environment Secretary directly to express their concern and objections to taking the pylons onshore and not considering undergrounding in spite of the damage that pylons would do to the Lake District's landscape. You can access the campaign here:

For more information:

Note: this petition was initiated by Kate Willshaw of Friends of the Lake District ahead of the "North West Coast Connections" consultation, which has now ended. Kate has invited Power Without Pylons to continue to promote it.

Lake District National Park

Maps © Stamen; Data © OSM and contributors, ODbL

Reasons for signing

  • It is vandalism of the environment all in the name of maximizing profit for the National Grid. Those behind this proposal should be ashamed.
  • There is a viable alternative that will not blight the landscape.
  • I visit my Grandma every holiday. I love to climb Lacra. The Whicham Valley is beautiful and I am frightened that these giant pylons will cause health problems to the people that live near them


2016-09-24 10:11:48 +0100

1,000 signatures reached

2016-04-18 17:04:59 +0100

500 signatures reached

2015-03-30 14:39:08 +0100

100 signatures reached

2015-03-26 20:44:09 +0000

50 signatures reached

2015-03-14 22:32:03 +0000

25 signatures reached

2014-11-23 11:43:06 +0000

10 signatures reached