As a creator and agency owner working with multiple TikTok creator networks, I witness firsthand the growing impact of TikTok's unfair AI moderation system. Every day, creators—including myself—are forced to battle repeated false restrictions and violations that should never have been issued in the first place. It has become common for creators to receive between four and ten restrictions or violations per day, many of which are later overturned on appeal. This raises serious concerns about the accuracy and reliability of TikTok's moderation system. The problem extends far beyond individual creators. Agencies managing multiple accounts spend countless hours submitting appeals, chasing reviews, and dealing with disruptions caused by automated moderation errors. For creators who rely on TikTok for income, these mistakes can affect their livelihoods, growth, and ability to reach their audiences. If creators within a handful of networks are experiencing this level of false enforcement every day, imagine how many thousands of creators worldwide may be facing the same issue. We support moderation that keeps users safe, but moderation must also be fair, transparent, and accountable. AI should assist human moderators—not replace them entirely. Users deserve meaningful appeals, clear explanations, and decisions that are made accurately. TikTok has a responsibility to reform its moderation system so that creators are protected from repeated false enforcement and can use the platform without fear of unjust restrictions.

The nation seems plagued by the business model of on-line deivery couriers. They enter into contracts with vendors to deliver goods purchased from them.  The actuality is the creation of a "Safe spot" . They don't appear to have any obligation to place it in your possession simply in a safe spot convenient to them which can be anywhere on the property. They dont seem to have any obligation to tell you they're coming or when they've been. A photo of a purchase somewhere is sufficient to satisfy the contract apparently.  There are cases of stacks of purchases dumped in tower block entrance foyers claiming to be safe place which are immediately being stolen. There are cases of parcels being put in dustbins unbeknown to the purchaser with the consequence that the bins were emptied. Parcels being stolen from peoples doorsteps is common, but a safe place according the the business model of the companies.  Clearly the industry is not effective at self regulation. It needs a public inquiry to identify the legality, extent and the cost to the nation and recommend legislative solutions required to control it.

I am one of 62 former Vodafone franchisees who lost almost everything. I took out loans to franchise three of Vodafone’s shops, only to have the rug pulled out from under me when commission rates were abruptly slashed. The impact was devastating. My revenue collapsed, and the stress was so severe I ended up on a heart monitor. My family feared I would take my own life. I am not alone; many of my colleagues have faced financial ruin, depression, and the risk of losing their homes. For another Vodafone franchisee and lifelong supporter of the company, Adrian Howe, the pressure appears to have become overwhelming. He is believed to have taken his own life in 2018, leaving behind a devastated family. In the weeks before his death, his family have said he was deeply anxious due to severe financial pressure, having been required to secure what he believed was an unviable second store against the family home. Adrian should never have been put in that position - franchisees need better protections.  From coffee shops to the Post Office, thousands of local business owners have zero protection from this kind of corporate pressure. We take the risk, but the big brands hold all the power. Ministers have promised to look into these "harrowing stories." We need to make sure they don't just look, but act. Please sign to join our call on the Government to follow through on creating strong and robust statutory protections for franchisees.

Because the current tax burden is hindering the growth of small businesses and therefore hindering economic growth.

It’s important because people’s schedules and routines aren’t all the same—many of us miss the 10:30am cutoff but still want our favourite McDonald’s breakfast items later in the day. Offering breakfast all day supports flexibility, convenience, and customer choice. Others should join this campaign because it’s a simple change that could make a big difference in daily life, and when enough customers speak up, we can show McDonald’s that this is what the public truly wants. Together, we can help bring more accessibility and enjoyment to the McDonald’s experience.

It’s important that trusted, well know British, family brands are non-political and take special care when advertising on far right, controversial TV outlets

Netflix subscription packages are rising by as much as 20% despite Netflix making huge profits in the UK. Netflix paid just £14.2 million in taxes in the UK despite revenue of £1.7 billion.  It’s clear that Netflix is prioritising profits over its customers, and they need to know that UK consumers have the power to push back. When one streaming giant raises prices, the rest follow. It’s unacceptable. Add your name to the petition, and then share with your family and friends to spread the word! 

Because it is ruining peoples lives and they are afraid to speak up about it ,because clearly they realise that they have a gambling problem and if the industry is doing their job these people will be safe and able to recover from their mental health issues because gambling is a big mental illness and people don't talk about it enough

Convenience stores run by Tesco, Sainsburys and Morrisons, which tend to be in the centre of cities and towns as well as rural areas, have been found to charge more for the same product compared to their bigger stores.  Not everyone has access to transport or the time to head to the bigger cheaper store. So customers are being forced to shell out way more just for their basics each week. Consumer group, Which! found that the difference in the price of goods can run to hundreds of pounds over the course of a year. They justify the higher prices by citing higher rent and operating costs, but when these companies are making billions in profit, should they really be charging customers more?  You may live near a big supermarket and be lucky enough not to have to rely on a smaller convenience store like others do. But that choice in supermarkets also means you have the power to pressure these stores to do right by all their customers.

This means that each partner can have their own version of the petition to grow their mailing list with, or we can share a version with everyone's opt-in on it. 

Ultra-fast fashion brand Shein stands accused of exploiting workers, damaging the environment, and avoiding tax. Yet it is currently ramping up plans to sell its shares on the London Stock Exchange. US lawmakers already rejected Shein's attempt to list on the New York Stock Exchange over alleged labour malpractice and tax avoidance. We must not let them sneak in and make millions on Britain’s financial markets - not while they stand accused of horrendous exploitation of people and the planet. It’s time to say no to companies that violate workers rights, exacerbate climate breakdown, and avoid taxes. It’s time to Say No to Shein.

This IS false advertising. It IS business mispractice. It IS immoral. It creates a false sense of worth and affordability and it is aimed at adding in an additional level of mysticism within pricing structures to make the end payment total seem less daunting than it is in hopes to trick people out of the money that they are spending. Businesses need to be transparent and trustworthy, this is neither.