To: Sue Bruce, Chief Executive, City of Edinburgh Council

"Caltongate/ New Waverley'' Petition

"Caltongate/ New Waverley'' Petition

The purpose of this petition is to register continuing objection to the latest proposed "Caltongate/ New Waverley" plans, and call for a full independent enquiry into this highly controversial scheme so that a satisfactory outcome can be achieved that befits the potential of this magnificent World Heritage site.

Why is this important?

Described as the most considerable development in the area “since the 12th century”, the "Caltongate/ New Waverley" development of the Waverley Valley represents one of the finest inner city real estate opportunities in the country. Having suffered as a blighted gap site for almost 10 years development is well overdue, yet the proposed plans have been marred with widespread opposition and controversy, falling well short of a fitting exemplar vision.

Those individuals and local interest groups that have thus far objected to this masterplan have been ignored and subjected to a process of attrition, in spite of the Council's stated commitments to “listen... and work together with local communities” and “conserve the City's built heritage”.

Hundreds of documents have had to be considered without clemency shown by the Council for extending public consultation. This has put great strain on those members of the public engaged with the process which significantly contributed to the recent collapse of the Old Town Community Council.

The extensive grounds for objection are as follows:

The proposed development represents a grave threat to the UNESCO World Heritage status of the Old Town due to inappropriate and insensitive design that is contrary to local planning guidelines.

Inexcusable neglect of listed buildings within the World Heritage designation, including council housing fronting on to the Royal Mile and the Canongate Venture building.

Threatened demolition of previously well used and valued public listed buildings.

Significant loss of revenue from public buildings which have lain empty for over 5 years in favour of private speculative interests.

Failure to achieve 'Best Value' in the transfer and sale of public assets. E.g. The Jeffrey Street arches which are to be “sold by way of a 125 year internal repairing and insuring leasehold basis on a peppercorn rent”.

Due diligence has not been satisfactorily demonstrated.

The proposed development will lead to fundamental 'leakage' in the local economy, compromising existing local businesses, in particular the City's many small, independent guest houses.

An over provision of hotels, offices, pubs/clubs and retail outlets.

Controversial planning decisions, granted in the face of overwhelming public opposition, lapsed but subsequently extended in favour of private economic interests, in contravention of policy.

Sale to previous developer deemed “illegal” by European Commission.

Failure of developer to honour bond that would have mitigated against the adverse affect of blight from this proposed development.

How it will be delivered

It is intended to submit this petition at the hearing of the Development Management Sub-Committee on Wednesday 29 January 2014.

Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Category


Reasons for signing

  • No developer should be allowed t threaten World HeritaStatus to the old twn.
  • It does not respect true democratic process; it is grotesque; it risks our UNESCO WHS rating. We do not need another ill-considered project bullied through and over the wishes of local residents. I note the petition date shows as January 2014. What is its stauts now?
  • As an architecture student studying at Edinburgh University, as well as living in Edinburgh all my life, it saddens me to see such poor buildings being designed for such a unique site. Just like the new SoCo development just up the road, it seems this development will add to the omnipresent yellow sandstone - bog average buildings being built in and around Edinburgh's Old and New Town of late with very little in the way of good design. Edinburgh really deserves something a lot better.

Updates

2014-01-29 09:03:59 +0000

5,000 signatures reached

2014-01-22 15:09:02 +0000

1,000 signatures reached

2014-01-21 18:28:47 +0000

500 signatures reached

2014-01-21 12:58:44 +0000

100 signatures reached

2014-01-21 12:43:37 +0000

50 signatures reached

2014-01-21 12:26:39 +0000

25 signatures reached

2014-01-21 10:57:46 +0000

10 signatures reached