Don’t price disabled people out of independenceStop the Motability VAT and insurance tax changes From 1 July 2026, the Government plans to change tax reliefs on Motability and other disabled vehicle leasing schemes. This could mean extra VAT on advance payments and Insurance Premium Tax on new leases. For many disabled people, a suitable vehicle is not a luxury. It is the difference between independence and isolation. Disabled people use Motability vehicles to get to medical appointments, work, shops, family, care, community life and everyday essentials. Many of us cannot rely on public transport because it is inaccessible, unreliable, painful, exhausting, unsafe, or simply not available where we live. The Government says protections will remain for vehicles designed or substantially adapted for wheelchair or stretcher users. But disability is wider than that. Many disabled people need a particular vehicle because of arthritis, chronic pain, fatigue, autism, PTSD, neurological conditions, falls risk, carers, medical equipment, seating position, vehicle height, boot space, automatic transmission, or inability to use public transport. This change risks creating a two-tier system: people with the most visibly adapted vehicles may still be protected, while other disabled people with serious mobility needs face higher costs. If the Government’s concern is luxury vehicles, then it should target luxury vehicles. It should not increase the cost of ordinary disabled transport for people who need a suitable car to live independently. This is also an equality issue. Before making changes that affect disabled people’s access to transport, the Government should publish the full Equality Act assessment, the modelling of how many disabled people may be affected, and the reasons why a targeted luxury-vehicle policy was not chosen instead. Disabled people are already facing rising care costs, energy costs, housing adaptation problems, inaccessible transport, and pressure on disability support. Adding extra costs to disabled vehicles risks pushing more people into isolation, dependency and crisis. We are asking the Chancellor and HM Treasury to: 1. Pause the Motability VAT and Insurance Premium Tax changes. 2. Publish the full Equality Act / Public Sector Equality Duty assessment. 3. Publish modelling showing how many disabled people may pay more, trade down to unsuitable vehicles, delay replacement, or leave the scheme. 4. Protect disabled people who need suitable vehicles for disability reasons, not only wheelchair or stretcher users. 5. Use targeted luxury-vehicle rules if that is the concern, rather than broad tax changes that risk harming disabled people. 6. Review the policy with disabled people, disability organisations and Motability users before it takes effect. Disabled people should not be priced out of independence. Please sign and share this petition.

For over 15 years, Kim has cleaned the streets of Dalston Square - and become a real part of the community while doing it. The local community and all the dogs adore her. She's a familiar, friendly face woven into daily life here. Now she's being moved elsewhere, with little warning. She's heartbroken about the decision, as are we. We understand the council sometimes needs to relocate staff, but we're asking Hackney Council to consider something in their decision that doesn't show up on their rota system: the deep ties Kim has built here over 15 years, and how much residents value her.  Please let us keep Kim. We love her dearly.

I am starting this petition because I want to speak for those students who deserve the right to perform to the best of their ability in a meritocratic system, where success is based on talent and effort rather than the ability to afford travel costs. I have seen many students struggle with the cost of travel to their place of study, and the impact this has on their education is often underestimated. For some, the daily or weekly cost of train and bus fares becomes a constant pressure that shapes their decisions long before they even start their course. In many cases, students are forced to narrow their choices of schools, colleges, or sixth forms based not on academic fit or personal ambition, but on what they can realistically afford to reach. This means that even when a student is capable of studying somewhere that could better support their future, the cost of getting there can stand in the way. This can also affect attendance and performance. When travel is expensive, I have seen some students missing classes, reduce how often they attend, or take longer and more complicated routes just to manage costs. Over time, this can impact learning, confidence, and overall educational experience. Education is meant to be an equal opportunity, but unequal travel costs create an uneven playing field. Students from different areas do not have the same access to the same institutions, even within the same country, simply because of transport pricing. We need to speak up for these students and work towards a system where education is truly accessible, and no one is limited in their potential because of where they live or the cost of reaching the place where they need to be.

Artificial Intelligence offers major opportunities, but without proper safeguards it could undermine jobs, creativity, dignity and meaningful human roles. Human contribution is not only economic - it supports identity, wellbeing, purpose and community connection. We are concerned that unregulated AI could enable manipulation, exploitation, misinformation and dangerous concentrations of power. In sensitive areas such as care, education and mental health support, human empathy, accountability and judgement must not be replaced by automated systems. We believe the Government should act now to: • protect human creativity, care and social connection, • ensure transparency and accountability in AI systems, • require human oversight where decisions affect people’s lives, • assess the social impact of AI before widespread deployment, • and ensure technology strengthens society while preserving dignity, opportunity and public trust. • AI should enhance human potential - not diminish it.

The nation seems plagued by the business model of on-line deivery couriers. They enter into contracts with vendors to deliver goods purchased from them.  The actuality is the creation of a "Safe spot" . They don't appear to have any obligation to place it in your possession simply in a safe spot convenient to them which can be anywhere on the property. They dont seem to have any obligation to tell you they're coming or when they've been. A photo of a purchase somewhere is sufficient to satisfy the contract apparently.  There are cases of stacks of purchases dumped in tower block entrance foyers claiming to be safe place which are immediately being stolen. There are cases of parcels being put in dustbins unbeknown to the purchaser with the consequence that the bins were emptied. Parcels being stolen from peoples doorsteps is common, but a safe place according the the business model of the companies.  Clearly the industry is not effective at self regulation. It needs a public inquiry to identify the legality, extent and the cost to the nation and recommend legislative solutions required to control it.

Young and new drivers across the UK are being charged excessive and unaffordable car insurance premiums, often exceeding £3,000–£6,000 annually, despite needing vehicles for work, education, and family responsibilities. 

Irvine is considered by many as one of snooker’s greatest ambassadors and a huge member of the snooker family.  Her depth of knowledge, attention to detail and outstanding broadcasting skills over many years have most certainly been of huge benefit to the game.  As well as other sports, Irvine commands enormous respect from players, officials and fans alike.  In a recent WST Snooker Club podcast, legend Stephen Hendry jokingly asked guest Abigail Davies if she wanted Irvine’s job – she replied: “You can’t replace God”.  Like the late John Virgo’s commentary – Irvine’s outstanding presenting at the World Championship and other majors has become somewhat of a snooker tradition. She is said to be "the face" of BBC snooker.  When Irvine was awarded an MBE in 2023, the World Snooker Tour reported: “In 2001 she [Irvine] joined the BBC’s snooker team, and remains the main presenter for the World Championship, Masters and UK Championship.” That’s now 25 years of service she has given to the sport.  Snooker Chat – a social media news brand with more 10 million post views this season alone – gauged public opinion on whether an inclusion was merited.  The X post on Snooker Chat went viral with more than 100,000 views and received more than 200 replies and more than 700 likes. It must be said several people indicated the Hall of Fame should be for players and officials only - that is a fair point. However, many of the replies favoured Irvine’s inclusion to the list – saying her dedication and service to the game warranted recognition. Among those to comment was twelve-times World Women’s Champion Reanne Evans. She retweeted our post and said:  “Now this is deserved. You can’t argue at all.” Other reposts from fans said: “What a great idea. Without a shadow of a doubt. H [Hazel] should be included.” And another said: “Hazel has been a great host for snooker over the last few decades.” After gauging public opinion, we feel it is only right to ask the snooker bodies involved to at least consider her inclusion.    

Pennington Common is the heart of our community — a beautiful green space used by families, dog walkers, and residents of all ages. But it’s missing something important: a dedicated outdoor fitness area for everyone. We propose installing a Calisthenics Park (outdoor street workout area) on the Common, ideally near the existing playground. This would include pull-up bars, dip stations, parallel bars, and bodyweight equipment — completely free to use. Why we need it: •  Provides affordable, inclusive fitness for all ages and abilities •  Supports physical and mental health in the fresh air •  Gives teenagers and young people a positive place to hang out and train •  Encourages community connection and active lifestyles •  Low maintenance and can be designed sensitively to fit the Common’s natural setting A modern calisthenics park would complement the playground and turn part of Pennington Common into a true community wellness hub. We urge Lymington and Pennington Town Council and New Forest District Council to support this proposal and help make Pennington fitter, healthier, and more vibrant. If you believe our community deserves better outdoor fitness facilities, please sign and share this petition. Together, let’s bring fitness and nature together on Pennington Common.

I’m calling for an end to taxpayer-funded bars in Parliament because politicians should live by the same standards as everyone else. Most people don’t work in buildings with subsidised alcohol on site, and Parliament shouldn’t be an exception. At a time when people are struggling with living costs and trust in politics is low, MPs should be setting an example — not defending drinking culture at taxpayers’ expense.

We, the undersigned residents of Trowbridge and surrounding parishes, call on Trowbridge Town Council (TTC) to immediately end the routine use of Glyphosate in our public spaces. Trowbridge once stood out for its commitment to weedkiller‑free management, but that progress has been undone by the return of spraying this year as a response to a limited number of complaints. We aim to show that there are many residents that are in support of a herbicide-free town.  Why We Are Calling for Change 1. Safeguarding Local Wildlife and Biodiversity Trowbridge is home to a rich ecosystem of insects, birds, reptiles, amphibians and small mammals. Insects make up the foundation of the food web, and their decrease has a ripple effect out. We are in a biodiversity crisis, and insect populations have declined by roughly 60% in the last 2 decades. Around three quarters of the crops that we grow are pollinated by insects. Glyphosate does not discriminate; it kills bees, butterflies, moths and other invertebrates. It also kills wildflowers and disrupts the delicate balance of our local habitats. Many councils across the UK have already reduced or eliminated herbicide use to support biodiversity recovery whereas Trowbridge has gone backwards through its use of Glyphosate this year. 2. Protecting Public Health There is a growing body of evidence that links the exposure to Glyphosate to potential health risks, including Parkinson's, some Cancers, Asthma, and Mental Health conditions (Pesticide Action Network). Residents and visitors should be able to enjoy public spaces without exposure to substances that may pose unnecessary risks. People enjoying our public spaces, children walking to school, and pets exploring verges all deserve a safe environment. People who work for the town council should not have to use hazardous chemicals to care for public spaces, which should be there to promote health and well-being. 3. Supporting a Greener, More Sustainable Town Ending herbicide use aligns with wider environmental goals, including the Climate Emergency that Trowbridge Town Council declared in 2019. The Climate Crisis and the Biodiversity Crisis are inextricably linked, and reducing pesticide pollution is a vital part of supporting nature‑friendly land management. Alternative methods such as manual weeding, mechanical removal, mulching, and planting low‑maintenance ground cover are already being used successfully in towns and cities across the UK. We encourage TTC to back up their words with actions once again.  4. Responding to Community Concerns In defense of TTC we understand that spraying was brought back after complaints from a small number of residents. This petition aims to show you that there are many more residents who support sustainable and environmentally friendly weed control. Outside of situations where herbicides are legally required, or to control an invasive species, weedkiller should not be used as a regular maintenance tool just because it is shortsightedly believed to be a “cheaper” option.  A modern, environmentally conscious town should listen to these concerns and adopt safer, more sustainable practices. A Better Future for Trowbridge By ending herbicide use, Trowbridge can become a healthier, greener, and more forward‑thinking town. This change would demonstrate leadership, protect our environment, and reflect the values of residents who want a safe, thriving and bio-diverse community for generations to come.  

It will mean the environment agency and the council will be made to test the waters regularly and the regulations around releasing any pollutants will be stricter.  I believe i can achieve my goal but i need the help of locals and local businesses. Thank you for reading!!

What other workplace subsidises alcohol to employees in the workplace. Especially when their decisions are likely to affect the lives of other people. Bring in random drink and drugs testing. It has been observed on TV coverage of the Commons that members are attending and voting whilst under the influence of alcohol or drugs. They are voting on issues that affect the lives of the public. Inspection of the toilets have found traces of cocaine in most of them. This is totally unacceptable in public servants.