Please re think the closure of the last bank on our high Street. It is well used and well needed. Please think of the local people who value this bank over your profits. It is always busy in there and I can't believe you say its being closed because not enough people use it. This is a complete lie as it is always busy. Your staff are friendly and know their customers there is a very pleasant feel in this bank. Lots of elderly use this bank and without it there is a 2 hour return trip on a bus to get to the next nearest bank . This is very unfair. There use to be a rule the last bank on a high street had to stay when did this change? Not everybody wants to bank on line and you are being very selfish forcing people into this direction to cut costs and line your pockets. Banks are suppose to be for the people so why are they all disappearing? We are a little village but we are still as important as any big town ,our money is still as good as any big town . You are taking the heart out of our village. We need to take a stand against these big banks it's their customers who pay their wages. Why do we never get a say. Our village banks are really important and need to be kept open. Our feeling should be taken into account.

Our children and their very committed teachers deserve a safe environment, please support us in improving the road safety around the school to ensure that no one is ever hurt.

Park House has been a community landmark for over 150 years with a deep-rooted history spanning from Crosby and Waterloo's original settlement from marshland to the districts that they are today. Be it the detailed Italianate design of the structure, the role it has played in modern-day Catholic faith or simply the medical influence on so many people's lives across the Sefton Borough and beyond, there are a host of diverse reasons to preserve this community asset. It can be universally accepted that an alternative use for the site as proposed by our preferred purchaser would definitively bolster efforts to reduce an extreme release of carbon into the atmosphere if demolition and deforestation were to proceed.

I am a practitioner, employed by HCRG Care Group on an Agenda for Change contract to deliver NHS services on behalf of the NHS. The company informed staff on 26/04/23 that the government will not be funding some of the recent Agenda for Change pay deal for people not directly employed by the NHS. This means that NHS staff not working for NHS trusts will not receive the pay deal, whereas colleagues working for NHS trusts providing the same services and care will. This is completely unjust, I have worked in my current role for seven years, initially under an NHS Trust then under Virgin Care, (via TUPE) and now HCRG. I have had no input or influence on who my employers have been and by choice would still be working for an NHS trust. Staff on Agenda for Change contacts not working directly for the NHS are being unfairly penalised for a situation under which they have no control. I am asking for your help in appealing to the people in Government who have made this decision to change their minds and ensure all NHS staff receive this money. All NHS staff work equally hard wherever they are employed, and the government should treat us all fairly in rewarding us for that work.

The house of Lords has grown ridiculously large due to Tories trying to pack it. It should be a small hard working revising chamber of the great and the good, not a title to be bought by dubious characters and failed politicians

Because I'm sickened to the back teeth of corrupt liars being rewarded for propping up the most shambolic, self serving government in living memory. Nominated by a lying charlatan who has no moral compass at all. Hardly someone to be trusted to bestow honors on anyone

The club and its licence is under review and there is a threat of closure from Westminster Council. We believe that this would be a great loss to our community and support is needed in order to prevent the club being forced to close its doors. We believe that with the support of its members and the wider community, Trisha's can continue to thrive and provide a valuable service to its members for many more years to come. Please sign this petition to show your support and to urge the powers that be to keep the club open.

The UK is desperately crying out for change. The current UK Government is riddled with economic incompetence, negligence with the NHS, broken promises and scandals. It is time the public were given a say to start afresh. The current UK Government consists of incompetence over the economy, the mishandling of the cost of living crisis, mishandling of the Covid-19 pandemic, negligence with the NHS, broken promises after broken promises and scandals after scandals. The UK Government is trying to withhold the truth and cover up its failures with regards to the the Covid-19 pandemic. The current UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is more than happy to give the former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson what he wants by saying yes to the former UK Prime Minister’s honours list. This is totally wrong on all aspects because the former UK Prime Minister is under multiple investigations. It is time the UK public were given a say on whether they want the current UK Government to continue or to start afresh with a General Election.

Now, following publication of its ‘next steps’ document on 4 April 2023, many of the remaining measures from the White Paper have been cut back or even abandoned. Most notably, a key promise of at least £500 million to be spent on workforce training, qualifications and wellbeing has been cut to £250 million, and a promised £300 million to transform housing options has been replaced by £102 million for smaller in-home adaptations. Spending on innovation and improvement has also been cut back, though investment in digital has emerged largely untouched and there are very small pots for carer support, international recruitment and volunteers. This reduction in spending is particularly disappointing because it comes at a time when all the trends on adult social care are going in the wrong direction: more people are asking for support but fewer are getting it; workforce vacancies are at an all-time high and public satisfaction with social care is at its lowest ever. In September 2021 Boris Johnson's government announced a proposed cap of £86,000 to be introduced for Adult Social Care in England from October 2023. This means the cap on personal care costs will place a limit on the costs that people will need to spend to meet their eligible care and support needs. Meaning you will never pay any more that £86,000 over your lifetime. It was labelled a “watershed moment” and the “biggest shakeup in a generation”. We have now learned that Rishi Sunak's government has postponed the introduction of the proposed cap until 2025. However, in recent months – and following two changes of prime minister – reform has entirely stalled. In its November 2022 Autumn Statement, the government announced that the cap and means test reforms would be postponed until October 2025. With a general election to be held no later than January 2025, therefore there is a significant risk that these reforms are never implemented. Please help me get this reform brought in force now. Thank you.

The bill was intended to: 1. Fulfill the Government’s promise to stop live animal exports for slaughter and fattening 2. Introduce powers to improve animal welfare by ending cruel practices such as puppy smuggling and the keeping of primates as pets. It is important for animals because of the conditions so many animals are kept in when exported for slaughter and fattening and when puppy farmed. It is important for people, who often buy sick or misrepresented puppies in good faith and they become family members before their diseases and early mistreatment show. It is important for people because animals sent overseas should not be part of our food chain but it is impossible to trace what happens to them. It is important for the Government because it was in their manifesto.

Because we (the general population) are dying at astoundingly high rates over the norm and even over the death rates during 2019 / 2020 / 2021 during the most serious period of covid deaths.

Lydden Road has been the location for light industry since the early 20th century. And the redevelopment of local light industrial sites is inevitable. But Earlsfield is a highly populated residential area that continues to grow: there are new residential developments in progress next to the same site! Allowing round-the-clock HGV delivery access, along with the intense outbound delivery traffic that will result from this development, will have a significant impact on this area. Building an 11 meter high warehouse (more than twice the height of the current building - and higher than a two storey house) so close to family homes, is not acceptable to residents on the surrounding streets. We ask the developer to consider and design a compromise which meets the needs of the site, their business plan, AND local residents. We request that the Wandsworth Council planning committee recognise the needs and desires of their residents and withhold approval until this compromise has been reached.