This is important due to the fact that many areas are in low income and struggle to pay bills,so to hype the price then have nothing to show for this is totally wrong...people don't buy faulty goods.

Microplastics is a massive global issue with unforseen physiological effects a range of species, if not all; this may lead to ecosystem collapse. There is also evidence of cancer formation linked to microplastic. The world's governments should crack down on this, forcing corporations to produce cosmetics that are not harmful to the environment. Many people are choosing specific brands to be more eco-aware, but there is an element of greenwashing involved, leading to use of "eco" products that bluntly aren't. For example, 70% of my Christmas gifts that happened to be cosmetics contained acrylate copolymer, despite packaging and statements that suggested otherwise. Colgate used to include "microbead technology" in some products, yet they were taken off the market after microbeads became public knowledge- this shows that companies can act to reduce impact in response to public demand and scientific data, so this needs to happen on a global scale in order to prevent further pollution, that is unnecessary and damaging.

to have a more reliable bus service to use and get to work and other places where they need to be on time.

to get a better more reliable bus service that people will then use.

Universal Credit sanctions increase people problems rather than solving them. Everybody should be able to survive with a universal basic income. People are already in a difficult circumstances during the pandemic. The government, DWP and Job Centres should help them rather than sanctioning them.

Views of the Totterdown escarpment regularly appear in local and national publications as an iconic feature of our city. The Heritage Assessment of the Temple Quarter Enterprise Zone includes the Totterdown escarpment as one of the principal iconic landmarks in the vicinity of Temple Quarter. Bristol’s City Design Team describe the Totterdown escarpment as “an iconic cityscape feature” that requires careful thought for the whole of the Framework area. However, views of the escarpment are threatened by inappropriate proposals for tower blocks (from 6+ground to 21+ground) in the proposed redevelopment of the Mead Street. We are not against creating a new mixed-use neighbourhood along Mead Street, but this must be at heights that do not obscure the panorama of the Totterdown escarpment.

#suezmaruapology campaign: In 1949, as the decades-long hunt to convict Nazi war criminals was only four years old, and inexplicably far-east war crime trials would be closed within months, a Japanese soldier, Y. Kashiki, wrote to Allied war crime investigators. He outlined a previously unknown war crime of such barbarity it retains the power to shock and repulse today. Kashiki described, "The fact[s] of prisoners murder case, [aboard] the S. S. Suez-Maru, a Japanese transport ship, which...sailed from Ambon,...She was torpedoed and sunk... at...9.30 a.m. 29th Nov. 1943. [and] prisoners, about 270 or 280,... were killed on the reason that they could not be rescued. But, we, about 200 Japanese, who were on board the ship, were all rescued..." In fact, between 250-300 defenceless British and Dutch prisoners of war, who had already suffered nearly two years of barbaric treatment, survived the sinking of their 'hellship' transport, then spent some seven hours clinging to flotsam in the open Pacific, only to be systematically machine-gunned and shot by rifle-fire in cold blood, by c.20 named gunnery crew (headed by D. Yatsuka), aboard their Japanese naval escort, the minesweeper, W12. The W12 commander (O.Kawano) and war crime perpetrators (M. Iketani et al.), then conspired to falsify war records, and concealed the atrocity, until revealed by Kashiki, in 1949. A full investigation ensued, calling over 22 individuals for questioning, resulting in SCAP conclusion that, "It is considered that there is sufficient evidence to constitute a prima facie case against Kawano, Iketani, Yatsuka, and other[s]... officers and crew of minesweeper W12,... and to bring these participants to trial." This was no little-known war crime that accidentally 'fell between the cracks', this case was presented to the highest levels of the British Government. Significantly, the British Lord Chancellor, Jowitt, on exposure to the Suez Maru case, responded with horror, saying, “ ... the case of the Suez Maru atrocity is a particularly nasty one, and one which would arouse great feeling in this country as it concerns so many Allied men murdered at sea...” The British Foreign Secretary, Bevin, stated, "...there must inevitably be a strong moral case for bringing war-criminals to this kind of trial,...” and the British Secretary of State for War, Shinwell*, wrote that, "... the relatives of the murdered prisoners of war might well cause questions to be asked if they heard that those responsible would never be brought to justice.” The fact that this war crime was presented to the highest levels of the very Government elected to pursue justice for British subjects, that the right moral and legal decision was entirely within the gift of that Government, and that, in fact, the case had already been recommended to proceed to trial, and that the moment of justice was noted and ignored and thereby allowed to pass our loved ones by, and further, that the entirety of the Suez Maru case and the potential trial was then deliberately concealed from the very families of the men killed, is the reason for this campaign and petition.

While we accept that the council erected this fence with good intentions it became clear quite soon after that it was not required. Other areas of the park have been open for a long time and it seems this fence is just a leftover. It has though, a detrimental effect on park goers and should be removed forthwith and not be linked to any subsequent decisions over opening the paddling pool.

This is important, because disabled motorists are being treated differently to everyone else and I feel that we are being discriminated against. Why do we have to be kept waiting in a different area until our identity is checked.

Because our dogs have very little protection from the law. This needs to change - the law needs to protect our dogs as they are protected in England and as they are protected in most EU countries. They need to be protected in Scotland. Please, please sign our petition and help team Mouse make this change possible and get our dogs the protection they deserve.

Banning this item prevents the unnecessary suffering and pain for our pets and in some cases death.

Everyone has baby's prams and disabled people live here - it's a flat with 7 floors.