Times are tough, Tesco employs hundreds of thousands of people and should put them before billion pound profits.

Tesco's behavior is disgusting, leading supermarket in the UK undercutting others on wages, is truly disgusting.

Why is it important? A story of cruelty and the death of an animal lies behind every fur trim, pom-pom, and animal lining. To obtain fur, animals fall into traps and traps. Their deaths are usually slow and painful. Natural fur in clothing is entirely unnecessary since artificial alternatives provide the same qualities without the inherently cruel nature of natural fur. We care about the health of our pets - dogs, and cats, but, nevertheless, buying products from natural fur and leather, we pay for the brutal killing of other animals that have the same right to life as you and me. The fur production also pollutes the environment, as harmful chemicals are used to make the hides. Establishing a moratorium on products that contain real fur in your stores and collaborating with suppliers who have already switched to fake fur substitutes will show that your clothing line is committed to ending violence. Fur has become a symbol of luxury, not protection against the cold. Faux fur coats and warm coats perfectly warm us, and leatherette products are not inferior in beauty and elegance to genuine leather products. I'm David W., and the whole team believes the world will be kinder and better if we don't exterminate animals for fashion. Trust us and try new substitutes for natural fur. They are much better!

You don't have to be a regular Sea Road shopper to want the place to thrive. It serves people of all ages and it's a thoroughfare from Seaburn Metro to the beach, especially in summer. The paper version of the petition also says: "We are also concerned that, at a time when there is a need to reduce vehicle emissions, people will be forced to make additional car journeys because they no longer have a store that sells a wide range of reliable quality goods within easy walking distance."

We were promised the triple lock to counter things that are actually happening from next April only to have it taken off us just when we need it

Many schools are so ill-equipped and under-trained to deal with SEND issues, they either treat the child’s hidden disability as a behavioural problem, or blame parents for “exaggerating” (or even causing) their child’s needs. School is not an emotionally safe place for many SEND children, and absenteeism due to mental health difficulties is sky-rocketing, even amongst primary-age children. The trauma and damage these experiences cause is immeasurable, and sometimes life long: Many children fall out of the school system completely because they can no longer cope, meaning they never get the chance to fulfil their dreams or potential. As hidden disabilities become better recognised, this problem is only going to grow. SEND children need action, and they need it now.

Taxpayers deserve a service which is fit for purpose/ confers value for money.

Apart from the Windrush Generation of which some who now live abroad may have had there pensions affected or indeed Frozen. The Windrush Generation are also affected in other ways. For Instance. Surely It can not be right that if you can prove your right to live and work in the UK as a Windrush Survivor. And have still been subject to the unhealthy disadvantage within the Windrush Hostile Environment. There predicament are not included in the platform of the Tick Box compensation scheme application form in order to make a claim. By not including this segment of the Windrush Generation it excludes people who are prevented from making a personal claim whatsoever. If you do try to pursue a claim based on your personal experience and circumstances. The claim is very likely to be rejected. As hundreds of people including myself, have found out through personal experience. PLEASE SUPPORT THE PETITION IF YOU ARE IN SYMPATHY WITH OUR PLIGHT. We Welcome Your Support PLEASE NOTE. You DO NOT need to be a rejected Windrush Applicant to SUPPORT OUR PREDICAMENT by Signing This Petition. Thank You.

Today we can see how plastic is ubiquitous in our everyday lives. We can easily find thousands of pre-packaged items in supermarkets, plants, and factories. Most food, mattresses, bedding, things for the home, etc are sold in a plastic package. Although plastic makes our lives more convenient, overuse of packaging can cause damage to the environment and our health. Manufacturers must take greater responsibility to reduce plastic packaging consumption. How can plastic packaging be overused? The greatest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions is plastic material. Plastic does not biodegrade. While some believe plastic is safe to use now as it can be recycled or disposed of using new technology, the truth is that only 7% of plastic is recycled every day. The rest 93% go to landfills which can take up to 45 years to decompose. 93% of the plastic wastes pollute soil, water, and can pose serious threats to wildlife and humans. Further, 86% (or more) of the trash found in the Pacific Ocean is plastic. This makes the Pacific Ocean the "Great Pacific Garbage Patch". Plastic fragments may get into marine life's digestive system, poisoning them. Toxins can build up within the food chain. Food chain poisons can also be absorbed into the bodies of humans. It is possible for tough plastics to cause severe injuries and death in marine organisms. These plastics were responsible for the deaths of more than 1,000,000 animals, including seabirds and marine mammals. While we don't have an ideal plan yet to dispose of plastics, there are other options. As consumers, we have to reduce our plastic use in order to reduce plastic pollution. However, there are many over-packaged items in supermarkets today. It can be hard for consumers not to buy over-packaged items. Why is the problem with this dilemma for consumers? It's manufacturers! It is the responsibility of the manufacturer to dispose of excess packages. Reduced packages will not result in a loss of earnings. A well-designed package can promote the product's price, which increases both the cost for buyers and sellers. The cost and price of products can be reduced if manufacturers simplify packaging. Consumers will spend less on daily living expenses. Manufacturers are able to make greater profits as the public is more inclined to purchase products made by corporations that promote social responsibility. The goal of removing unnecessary packages is to solve the problem at its source. Additionally, it is far more effective to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases and global warming than relying only on individuals for their actions. I'm Laura Thomas and my team of the site https://laurathomaslinens.com/ wants for making positive changes in the world, sign the petition today! Let's change the world together!

I know that my family is not the only family in the uk that is finding it extremely hard to manage on a day to day basis. And also just like my family are struggling more than ever to just pay the bills The last couple of years for my family has been the worst ever on record for Debt. I Urge other people who are in the the same Financial Crisis as us to ask this Government not to stop the free Prescriptions For those who are worse off financially Who Cannot Afford The Prescription Charges And to have to pay those charges would push right over the edge.

I encourage everyone to join me in campaigning on this issue, out of a sense of health justice, and compassion - suffering is suffering, whereever it happens. It is appropriate to show recognition of our good fortune in having the choice of whether or not to be vaccinated, and to want to share that with others less fortunate. Thank you for supporting this campaign.

Stanmore station has been and is still used as a major station for Wembley. Parking would be a nightmare for all the attendees to Wembley if the development goes ahead.