• Save Trinity Church Car Park
    Our local church in Stafford (Trinity Church) is home to a lot of elderly people. Not only that but youth group organisations and also a theatre company for those who would potentially get over looked by mainstream companies due to difficulties.  This year the council have put in plans to knock down what used to be Wilkinsons to create more space for Stafford College which is great. However, the car park which separates the two buildings is planned to be removed.  This car park is a fundamental access point for the church and youth group organisations. With the church having the majority of elderly attendees, having this car park removed would mean they would have to walk from further afield for a service.  This in my eyes would reduce the amount of people attending and slowly but surely shut the church down completely. 
    33 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Oliver Bennett
  • Save our Parking Space on Whitworth Road, Woolwich, London
    We have lived on Whitworth Road for numerous years, and we recently saw a notice near where we live saying they are planning to paint double yellow lines outside our homes which will restrict not only our parking but also others parking along our road. It will restrict the number of available parking spaces along the whole stretch of Whitworth Road which is already an issue. Very often we are not able to park outside our homes as the parking is not available, and as we have elderly and people with medical conditions as well as children living here it will make it more difficult for us to leave as our cars will have to be parked further away from our home. i.e. on the other side of Whitworth or on the main road of Herbert Road. This can also affect peoples insurance premium as it requires your car to be parked outside your property. Also, the value of the property can be affected because of the lack of parking spaces available.
    53 of 100 Signatures
    Created by HC S
  • Develop the vacant site on Brixton Hill & Dumbarton Road
    This site has been vacant for almost 20 years. Lambeth Council gave generous permission to build flats here some time ago but the landowners have not started work and have left the site derelict. The location attracts graffiti and flytipping and is an eyesore.  The site is privately owned and the Council cannot simply direct work to happen. But it does have influence and enforcement powers.  If discussion with the landowner does not yield results, the Council should consider compulsory purchase to secure and clean up the site and to get homes built as soon as possible.
    6 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Martin Tiedemann
  • Prevent construction of Microsoft Hyperscale Datacentres in Leeds
    We are a collective of 100 people from all backgrounds coming together to oppose Microsoft’s planned development for 3 Hyperscale AI Data Centres at Skelton Grange.  This proposed megasite, which has already been given conditional planning approval, would consist of giant warehouses full of tens of thousands of AI computer chips running constantly to power Microsoft’s AI systems.  There is overwhelming evidence that this site would pose a risk to the health and wellbeing of local residents, and the surrounding environment. Cooling the chips would require thousands of litres of water every time the outside temperatures rise above 29 degrees – which will happen increasingly often as the climate crisis accelerates, particularly as datacentres contribute to the climate crisis. The site would use truly vast amounts of energy to power, making it by far the single biggest carbon emitter in Leeds. Over its planned 60 year lifetime it is projected to release more than 200,000,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide. This is almost the equivalent of one year of the UK’s entire emissions. Stopping this project is one of the most significant steps we could take to protect both our local environment and stop a truly staggering source of carbon emissions. The Leeds Planning Committee has already signed off on this megaproject, leaving the final decision in the hands of Chief Planning Officer Martin Elliot. There is still time to stop this final sign off, and following that to initiate a legal challenge. It is clear that the public were not properly informed about this project or given the opportunity to object, and that there was insufficient scrutiny of the project’s impacts. These impacts include: – water and power consumption – noise, light and air pollution – disposal of foulwater and waste heat  – surveillance and security changes – climate change We invite all people who care about this city and our planet to join the campaign team. Please help us by adding your name to this petition. 
    25,406 of 30,000 Signatures
    Created by Lianne Marie Mease
  • Wrexham: Say No to Another McDonald’s Drive-Thru
    Wrexham is a place that many of us are proud to call home. It is a place built on community, local businesses, and a growing ambition to create a vibrant future for residents and visitors alike. As a local business owner, I understand the challenges facing our high streets and independent businesses. Every day, hardworking local people invest their time, money and passion into serving our community, creating jobs, supporting local suppliers, and keeping money circulating within the local economy. That is why I am deeply concerned by proposals for yet another McDonald’s restaurant and drive-thru in Wrexham. This would be the fifth McDonald’s in the area and the third drive-thru. At a time when many independent cafés, restaurants and food businesses are working hard to survive rising costs and economic pressures, we should be asking whether this development truly meets a need within our community. Beyond the impact on local businesses, residents have legitimate concerns about increased traffic congestion, road safety, litter, noise pollution and the environmental impact that often accompanies large drive-thru developments. Many people already experience congestion on our roads and do not want to see this made worse. This petition is not about opposing progress or investment in Wrexham. It is about ensuring that development is appropriate, necessary and beneficial to the wider community. We believe that decisions about our town should reflect the voices of the people who live and work here. Wrexham deserves investment that strengthens our local economy, supports independent businesses, enhances community wellbeing and contributes positively to the character of our town. If you believe Wrexham does not need a fifth McDonald’s restaurant and a third drive-thru, please sign this petition and help send a clear message to decision-makers that our community’s voice matters. Together, we can ensure that future development reflects the needs and aspirations of the people of Wrexham
    432 of 500 Signatures
    Created by Hayley Koumas
  • Restore confidence in Bristol's planning system
    Our concern is that the Bristol City Council is currently failing to deliver an effective planning service, resulting in the approval of poor quality high-rise developments that are harming the cityscape and failing to address housing need. We urge councillors of all parties to consider the harm done when residents no longer have confidence in the city’s planning process, and when decisions are made that will cause long-term, if not irreparable, harm to Bristol’s neighbourhoods and city centre.
    403 of 500 Signatures
    Created by Suzanne Audrey
  • Save Groombridge Place
    The people of Groombridge overwhelmingly support the proposal to turn Groombridge Place into a Pig Hotel.  We are excited by the prospect of having such a wonderful venue on our doorstep.  We would be relieved that Groombridge Place will be sensitively renovated, improved and cared for into the future.  We will extremely disappointed and angry if this opportunity is allowed to slip away due to bureaucracy and lack of vision on the part of TWBC.
    1,429 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Mark Austen
  • Please help us stop development in Calgary Bay, Isle of Mull!
    Calgary Bay, situated on the beautiful Scottish Island of Mull, is one of the most picturesque spots in the country. This iconic beach is not just a haven for locals and visitors, but it is also home to myriad wildlife species. Beyond its natural beauty, the bay holds significant cultural and historical value. The connection between Calgary Bay and Calgary, Alberta, Canada is profound. It was in 1876 that Colonel James Macleod visited the bay and was so inspired by its stunning landscape that he proposed the name 'Calgary' for a new fort being established in Alberta. Calgary Bay's name and beauty went on to inspire the naming of what has become one of Canada's major cities. Despite its cultural, historical, and ecological importance, Calgary Bay is now facing the threat of irreversible change from proposed development plans. The untouched landscape, which has remained largely pristine through the years, is at risk of being marred by construction. The development plans could jeopardize the delicate balance of the local ecosystem and undermine the very essence of this treasured location. Preserving Calgary Bay is paramount not only for maintaining its natural beauty but also for safeguarding its role as a critical habitat for wildlife. Development in the area could severely disrupt the flora and fauna that depend on this unique landscape.  It is also a key visitor attraction for the island, supporting a fragile rural economy. Immediate action is needed to protect Calgary Bay from development, so that current and future generations can enjoy its tranquil beauty and learn about its historical significance. This is a call to ask the Council's Planning Committee to consider plans that threaten this invaluable site very carefully. Please join us in urging decision-makers to prioritise conservation and livelihoods of islanders over construction. Let the legacy of Calgary Bay continue to inspire and captivate those who visit. Public support is key in protecting the bay and getting this unwelcome planning application refused.  By signing this petition, you are confirming your objection to the proposed development reference 26/00126/PP.   Thank you!
    88 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Fiona Brunton
  • Stop the Car Wash Next to Murrayfield School
     The proposed car wash is right next to a primary school with SEND children, putting them at risk from increased traffic, chemical pollution, and water hazards. Rejecting this application protects children’s safety, health, and wellbeing, and ensures the school environment remains safe for learning and play. 
    57 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Skye Crawforf
  • Save Stanton’s Industrial Heritage - Protect 3 & 4 Lows Lane, Birthplace of British Aviation
    3 & 4 Lows Lane isn’t just another old cottage - it’s part of Stanton’s proud industrial history and the birthplace of Hugh Oswald Short, co-founder of Short Brothers and a pioneer of British aviation. From this small Derbyshire home, the Short brothers went on to design and build Britain’s first aircraft, working alongside the Wright brothers and laying the foundations of our nation’s aviation industry. Their later designs - including the Short Stirling, a key training aircraft in the Second World War - helped free up Lancaster bombers for critical missions, directly contributing to the war effort. Demolishing this birthplace would erase a vital connection between Stanton’s industrial past and Britain’s technological progress. Almost everything else from that era has already disappeared - this cottage is one of the last remaining links to where it all began. Once these historic places are gone, they’re gone forever. By standing together, we can show that our heritage matters - and that regeneration in Erewash should protect, not destroy, the places that tell our shared story.
    813 of 1,000 Signatures
    Created by Erewash Heritage Supporters
  • Petition to the Mayor and Scarborough Town Council
    Scarborough’s neighbourhoods—from South Cliff to Falsgrave, Newby to Northstead—have long offered safe, stable environments for families, workers, and retirees. But the accelerating rise of short-term holiday lets across the town is straining public services, inflating rents, and eroding community cohesion.  This report highlights key impacts observed town-wide and calls for proactive local planning to protect residential life while guiding tourism development toward sustainable areas.    In May 2023, over 620 crimes were recorded within a one-mile radius of South Cliff—but similar spikes are now surfacing in other neighbourhoods experiencing high holiday let turnover.  Most reported incidents include:  • Violent and sexual offences • Anti-social behaviour • Opportunistic theft Crime maps show strong overlap between dense short-let activity and elevated incident rates—including Royal Crescent, Belgrave Crescent, and expanding zones in North Bay and Old Town.   • High visitor turnover disrupts informal safety networks. • Reduced neighbourly interaction weakens community oversight. • Transient populations lead to lower accountability and higher risk tolerance.  Short-let hotspots stretch local services beyond capacity:   • Police coverage and community initiatives become inconsistent. • Waste teams face frequent noncompliance and overflow. • Noise complaints and minor vandalism increase in key areas including Westbourne Grove and Castle Road.   • Tourist-heavy zones offer concealment for criminal activity. • Drug offences and theft are more common around Cromwell Parade, Victoria Road, and parts of Old Town. • The lack of permanent residents makes it easier for offenders to operate unnoticed.   • Predictability and familiarity foster a sense of safety. • Vulnerable groups—including elderly residents and shift workers—report higher stress levels. • Loss of neighbourly trust reduces emotional wellbeing and social support.   • Holiday let conversions compromise historical architecture and neighbourhood identity. • Victorian and Edwardian homes, especially in South Cliff and Falsgrave, are ill-suited to transient occupancy. • Preserving heritage requires limits on incompatible short-let conversions.    North Yorkshire Council data (2023) shows:   • Over 600 long-term empty homes in Scarborough’s commercial core. • These areas are better equipped with infrastructure and zoning for tourism.  Scarborough is facing a town-wide challenge. The unchecked expansion of short-term holiday lets threatens the stability, character, and safety of its residential zones.   Recommended actions:   • Rigorous planning review for new short-term lets • Density limits in residential neighbourhoods • Strategic redirection of tourism to the town centre • Meaningful consultation with community members and civic groups By taking a balanced approach, Scarborough can promote tourism while safeguarding the wellbeing and integrity of its communities.      
    22 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Diletta Andrico
  • Oppose a Controlled Parking Zone in Shooters Hill
    Greenwich Council is proposing to introduce a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) in Shooters Hill (and in Charlton, Blackheath, Kidbrooke, Plumstead, West Thamesmead and Woolwich), which will significantly impact how and where residents, workers and visitors park. There are no train stations in Shooters Hill, and as the 10th highest hill in the whole of London (132 metres), cars are a reality and a necessity for many residents. The proposals being put forward drastically reduce the amount of parking available, and the signers of this petition feel this change is being made without proper consultation or consideration. Whether people are dropping children at school before going to work, or are using their cars for disability, age or health reasons - or just doing the shopping, people need parking outside their houses, schools and places of work that doesn’t put additional pressure on their finances, or create community tensions by residents, workers and visitors competing for spaces. In addition, evidence from other areas shows that similar parking restrictions often lead to unintended consequences, such as increased congestion, or pushing the parking problem into neighbouring areas. Greenwich Council must strive to understand all challenges specific to Shooters Hill instead of making blanket decisions that are then applied to the whole borough. Signers of this petition acknowledge that CPZs can help manage space, but real, lasting change means rethinking our streets with safer, greener design that genuinely supports walking, cycling, and better public transport. What’s needed is a progressive, long-term vision for sustainable streets, not a quick-fix CPZ policy presented as a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist in Shooters Hill. Local residents should not be being disenfranchised, and the council should not be trying to rush through consultations and any implementation of a CPZ before the borough wide elections due in May 2026. Petitioners urge the council to reconsider their plans for Shooters Hill, we do not need a CPZ on our hill. — Did you notice? • The plans in the consultation are dated June 2024 • The earlier February 2025 consultation received 3000 responses but the plans have not been updated to take into account this feedback before the new consultation was launched on the 14th of July — Once you have signed this petition, please also: 1. Take part in the Sustainable Streets consultation at sustainable-streets-rbg.commonplace.is and you can fill this in multiple times for different areas (the consultation deadline is currently the 22nd of August) 2. Get your neighbours, schools, workplaces and local groups to fill in the consultation and this petition - this is especially important as the consultation is taking place over the summer holidays when many people are away 3. Share the petition and the consultation link on social media 4. Email your ward councillor(s) telling them about this petition and how you feel about the proposed changes If we don’t respond then nothing will change, and the council will assume we are happy with the proposals. Shooters HiIl Conversation whatsapp.com/KmSZ46ndMmn6HxM2Xm5EOi instagram.com/shootershillconversation
    2,196 of 3,000 Signatures
    Created by Lara Ruffle Coles