Huge lorries, now using our A routes, are a constant worry simply size and the overgrowth has there body of the vehicle over the centre line. The growth of county hedges have not been cut or maintained ever, I know of several A routes that have never been maintained in fifty years. It is the responsibility of land owners and the highway maintainence to keep our routes safe.

These vehicles will only have one driver in the front vehicle and will be over 60 metres long. Motor organisations have warned against which will increase congestion and cause extra hazards for drivers. Safety on our already dangerous roads. Our roads are very different to US roads

There is already a Lidl store within a 5 minute drive of the proposed new development. The new development will potentially create more traffic in an already congested area.

Sheffield who have adopted this, have proven this will reduce accidents to motorcyclists without causing any disruption to busses. It will allow motorcyclists to travel safer in bad weather and avoid having to filter though busy traffic making it healthier and safer for motorcyclists, not breathing in dangerous fumes, or being cut up by cars.

This makes use of the paths that are already in place alongside most roads in towns and cities. Generally each road has two paths. For example the north to south path could be for pedestrians, the south to north for bicycles. More zebra crossings would be required to allow people to get to their side of the road. Side roads exiting onto main roads would need ’stop' signs rather than ’give way’ signs to ensure the safety of cyclists and pedestrians. The onus should be on the cars to stop as they are the ’stronger’ vehicles, can start and stop more readily and are the more dangerous in every sense. It would subtly shift the emphasis away from the cars dominion. Perceived danger deters people from cycling. From personal health to environmental issues, the fewer cars compared to pedestrians and cyclists there are the better. Why continue the way we are? There are so many issues to face, this is a small step in the right direction, it would not be costly to implement and could revolutionise the roads for us all. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/aug/04/fewer-cars-not-electric-cars-beat-air-pollution-says-top-uk-adviser-prof-frank-kelly The attached article, courtesy of Guardian News & Media Ltd, argues that we need less cars of all types (including electric) on the roads: “Prof Frank Kelly said that while electric vehicles emit no exhaust fumes, they still produce large amounts of tiny pollution particles from brake and tyre dust, for which the government already accepts there is no safe limit. …Toxic air causes 40,000 early deaths a year in the UK" Time for a change.

I no longer have a bus that will take me to the QE hospital, or to my GP. This is crazy.

The disabled and elderly people rely on the bus to town centre and the surrounding area, for shopping, drs appointments and the such like. Some people go to work on the bus aswell. Its simply not good enough to axe the service with out an alternative provision being put in its place!!!

Although it is just plain right rude to split a family up at the beginning of their family holiday it also causes safety issues for fellow passengers and stress to the parents travelling with children. Thomson Holidays #SelectYourSeat procedure puts profit before a child's welfare!

Reducing hobby not got all the facts blaming all for bad things done by others not all pilots fly with intent to brake the law

Its important we get paid for work thats been completed. Drivers use own cars, fuel, time to do these trip that uber provide on app and if fraudulant we drivers dont know any better. Why does driver loose out? Why doesnt uber have a system in place to avoid situations like that or insurance to cover cost of driver.

Inexperienced drivers are more likely to have a road accident, so remove the possibility of further impediment through drink. Heavier vehicles inflict more damage in a collision, so the driver should not have any impediment through alcohol. When the public put their lives in the hands of a stranger who is driving, they shouldn't be impaired in any way.

As this make it very difficult for the drivers to see and 9 out of 10 teams said they didn't want it, this would make the sport more dangerous